The Guessing Game: Let the Unconscious Pinpoint Fish

My apprehensions about water temperature quickly dispelled, because I wisely decided to bring along my portable sonar unit again. Last I did that, I learned a lot about the lake's depths, but today that temperature concerned me, and Brian and I found in short order that it was 53. Not bad. 

Of course, with the air temp never getting out of the low 50's--when we drove off at 6:03 p.m. it was 49, and an hour or more before that, I plainly saw my breath--that water was cooling. I've known early season bass to turn on when it's warming. Conditions such as Wednesday's with the high temp just about 70. Brian was out there on the same lake with Mark Licht that day, and they did great, Brian's biggest largemouth about 6 pounds, five of his six bass over four pounds, but in total, they caught 11 fish, compared to our 13 fish in the cold yesterday. 

That might be a photo of the biggest, above. I'm not sure, because I caught two bass well over four pounds--4.87 pounds, and 4.32 pounds. Another one of mine might have been only a quarter pound under four, another about three-and-a-half, a two and something 17-incher, a smallish bass of about two pounds, and another bass of about two-and-a-half. The crappie in the photo below hit a MiniKing spinnerbait and put up a real good fight on a light rod. My pickerel came off the hook when I was lifting it into the boat, falling against the gunwale, then into the water, not into the boat, so you decide if that was really a catch. 

Brian called it a cigar. Suffice it to say not every fish is photographed. Brian did catch three nice bass; possibly every one of them was over three pounds. His pickerel was a nice one, too. 

Brian is committed to the Chatterbait. I like to use different lures. I started with a Chatterbait. Who would argue against its success the day before? I wasn't sure at first if I wanted to bring my light rod, but that MiniKing spinnerbait was looking good, and I did not deny it. Nor once we had cast Chatterbaits for three or four minutes to no takers among residual weedbeds. The MiniKing got hit after five or 10 minutes. I repeated the same cast and hooked up. At first I thought pickerel, then it felt like a nice bass, but it turned out to be a crappie only about 13 inches long! Partly, it was that light rod. One I built from a St. Croix blank that cost me $70.00 in 2005. 

The wind was a about right but a little catty-cornered. It generally blew us up towards the back of the lake but at about a 45-degree angle. Again & again, we had to paddle away from shore. For a fairly long while--altogether we fished maybe four-and-a-half hours--I cast that spinnerbait, catching the pickerel and the smallest bass. A pickerel that small never would have hit a Chatterbait. Those are big lures for big fish. The bass might have hit it. And might not have. It was only about 16 inches long. Didn't even fight as hard as the crappie had. It got me thinking about small lures for small fish. I have nothing against catching smaller ones, and I caught plenty of big ones yesterday. It was nice catching small ones, too. I also caught a 19-inch largemouth on that little spinnerbait. 

I tried the Chatterbait repeatedly but nothing would hit. But I like to think I'm good at guessing where to place a Senko-type worm rigged Wacky. If you're casting to the water, you're not doing it right. Out in front of you is a lot of water. In this lake we fish, for example, it's mostly about five feet deep. There's weeds, but interspersed, and much of the time you can't tell where. All that water will only blind you if you don't create a spatial abstract of it and zero in on where your mind tells you to cast. Otherwise, it's just random and will only wear you down. It's not magic, but by using the mind, you create energy rather than lose it. The argument is simple. If you're interesting yourself at a guessing game, by which you convert the raw mass of water into a grid that tells you where to pinpoint the cast, you might rise to the occasion. You will, if results begin to suggest--as they have for me--that the unconscious mind is capable of putting you on fish. 

I had a rod at the ready. Pre-rigged with a brown Shim-E-Stick, good color for the overcast conditions. I picked it up and began my guessing game, which soon paid off with the 17-incher. Brian had caught one or two on his Chatterbait. Soon we positioned behind an island, and a bass picked up that Shim-E-Stick as I let it rest on bottom. It weighed 4.87 pounds, 20 1/2 inches. I caught another one of about 18 1/2 inches after I put my rod in a rod holder, letting the worm kind of deadstick. (The canoe drifted very slowly in the calm behind that island.) The bass took drag as the rod bent in the holder. As we began heading back to Brian's truck, I caught one about 16 1/2 inches on the brown worm nearly against the bank. Brian had caught his pickerel and his last bass. Before we really began the long paddle back, I gave that Chatterbait one last try. 

I had caught fish on both of my lighter rods. I wanted to even the score. Along that island shoreline, we've caught a lot of fish. I began by casting pretty close and parallel, and intended to progressively work my way out, not getting very far when I got whomped. The bass weighed 4.32 pounds, 20 inches.   

 

I thought this one was about 16 1/2 inches. Maybe it was a little better than that.

Artificial Intelligence and Fishing 

Last Days of Winter Trout Besides TCA Waters

One last try at the river trout as only two days remain before most waters close until Opening Day. Oliver Round and Loki the black Lab came today. Fifteen minutes less than two hours. Besides a couple of fish on for a moment I think were also suckers, I might have got hit twice from trout. Oliver had a sucker or carp on for a second. A big scale on his hook. 

Notice my sucker got hooked on the nose. 

I'm glad I caught trout this time around. October and November felt very discouraging, but December yielded just before extremely cold weather resulted in some ice fishing for some anglers. Pretty much for the months of January and February we ice fished. I saw some Facebook posts that prove not everyone gave up on the rivers, though there was a lot of ice on them. Naturally, fishing pressure got reduced. 

I caught trout in March for a change, though that might partly be owing to the fact of that ice covering spots like the one I've been hitting. Trout Conservation Areas will remain open. Last year I fished two of them, catching trout on the Pequest April 1st.

Doubt I'll do the same this year, as I'm eager to go bass fishing. Brian Cronk is out fishing Indian Lake as I write, trying a new glide bait for the big ones. 

After March 31st, I'm done jobbing. By all accounts I can drum up, I'll be done for life. That doesn't mean I won't return the form to the union that will allow me to return to work and preserve my pension for later, but as awful as the economy has become in recent weeks, I doubt it will become so devastating that I have to hold a job. 

I have important to work to do as a writer and photographer. More than I can possibly get done, so I have no natural interest in holding a job after I quit my present one. Only extreme devastation coming from aberrant leadership might mean I can't do that work as fully as I will be enabled by having time I currently have to commit to a low wage. Instead of that eventuality actually happening--amounting to a dystopian society no one would want: mass death, legal chaos, and so much unemployment I probably wouldn't find a job anyway--I tend to believe that things look worse when reflected by the media. 

Reservoir Level Low Exploring Spruce Run Creek Channel

I was curious about the channel of Spruce Run Creek. What that looks like for future reference, if I ever get a boat up there near Van Syckel's Road. I wasn't just starry eyed about finding pike and bass, though I thought that possible. If the reservoir ever refills, it might be a lot easier. 

It will, but when is anyone's guess. 

Surprised at how much rock, gravel, sand, and edgy drop-offs exist as the creek flows, I felt privileged to explore it and got photos to help me remember where interesting spots lie. Surrounding all that is muddy flat. 

Carp water pretty much.

I think I walked almost a mile to access the mouth of the creek as it becomes reservoir. Loki the black Lab had a field day running around that flat and exploring the creek bed. Where the creek widens and slows, as you can see in the photos below, it gains depths of at least three feet, maybe four, so I cast a jerkbait and worked it slow on the surface as much as I retrieved it. 

Something could have moved into that space, it seems, but if anything at all was there, it wasn't hitting. I'm sure the water temp remained in the 40's, though I don't know that for a fact. I didn't bring along a thermometer. One thing to remember about Spruce Run Creek is that it purportedly hosts wild brown trout. Even if it doesn't hold as many as Mulhockaway Creek on the other side of Spruce Run Reservoir, Spruce Run Creek is spring fed and stays cool, compared to streams that don't have the same kind of groundwater influence. 

The reservoir beyond that deeper creek mouth was super shallow. It's just a slow-sinking mud flat. To have attempted--which I didn't do--gaining the edge of water, would have meant sinking in wet mud. 

 

Front Came Through and Put Fish Off

If you remember from yesterday, I wrote about muddy water from the Delaware River possibly reaching the Island Farm Weir area of the Delaware and Raritan Canal today. 

I rode I-287 to exit 12, seeing as I passed over it on the bridge that the canal was clear. I felt a little surprised at that. And then I began riding north on Weston Road. Within a mile, almost to the area of the weir where I would park, the canal became muddy. Muddy water had indeed reached the area where we fishing yesterday, but I simply turned around and parked at the little park by the South Bound Brook canal lock and fished there. Water was plenty clear. I saw my shiner three feet deep or more. 

I fished hard for two hours. I grew all the more convinced that because the front came through, the fish turned off. Extreme winds gave that away. The temperature really wasn't bad, as high as 52, but it felt cold out there. Gusts came through of perhaps 60 mph. I saw a fat limb fall from a tree into the Raritan River, enormous splash, and I was careful when standing high over the water at any edge, because I could have been blown off my feet.

When I had got there were a few small cumulus formations in the sky. When I left, I saw only one very small puff up there. All blue otherwise. 

I usually catch at least one fish when I fish the canal. Any time of year. As it went today, I was just glad I gave it a sincere effort. I did see a large turtle. Probably a slider. 

Near the end of the outing, I went into a mild reverie. Often that's when the fish hits, but not today. I began ruminating a little bit about catching up on a few spots I haven't fished in decades. For what they are, they're a long drive away. I routinely drive an hour to access spots to the north. Mostly, they're promising places. I wouldn't say the two I have in mind are bad this time of year, however. Not when temperatures have warmed. 

One of the spots is a very shallow, very weedy pond that warms five to 10 degrees better than the canal when temperatures spike early in the spring. The pond empties through a pipe into the canal, and while lots of fish can be caught in the pond, they're usually small, although I did once catch a 20-inch pickerel. But at the pipe, I've caught some of the biggest fish I ever have in the canal, which come and bask in that warmer water. A 22-inch pickerel and I have a vague memory of encountering a nice bass. My biggest crappie, too, and lots of that species. 

Thirdly, there's Baker's Basin, which I suspect is no longer fished. I might not be able to fish the pond effectively, because overgrown, but in any event, it will be interesting to evaluate. 

Maybe next year when I have more time. 

Millstone Memories 

Bass from the Cold Delaware and Raritan Canal

The bottommost photo is of the flooded Raritan River. I believed the canal might be clear enough to fish. If not, my idea was to fish Round Valley Pond, which Oliver corrected me on. The park closes at 4 p.m. We'd have no time. 

We met at my house, then rode over to the Sporting Life in my car. Me, Oliver, Brian. Bought a dozen large shiners. Dead ones work, too. 

Brian said he wanted to throw paddletails. (At the end of the outing, he was throwing a Chatterbait.) 

Driving over really wasn't bad. We took 22 East, cut over to 28, went through Somerville Circle, connected to 206. Over to Manville. Onto Wilhousky. Soon we saw the canal. Normal color.

It takes a while before muddy water from the Delaware gets over here. I love fishing that canal so much, I want to do it again tomorrow, but it's possible muddy water is on the way. If I get there and that's the case, I'll go over to Round Valley Pond, unless the thought of something else crops up. A really interesting option is Baker's Basin Pond, but Lawrence Township is fully an hour away.

Besides, when I last visited there, trails had some pretty heavy overgrowth, so it's possible those trails no longer exist and the pond is just a safe haven for gamefish that is no longer fished. 

We can't "go back to the 70's." If no one's fishing Baker's Basin, it's not the 70's. The place was hit every day back then. 

It produced, too.

Do you believe for a moment a pond that's been abandoned, possibly even the extensive parking lot grown-in, is going to become the place again, fished every day by local residents? If we're going to fish in the future, we need to embrace the technology of the future, not attempt to escape it into the past. 

On that note, production: for over a month it's looked like America lost what was shaping up to be the best bull market ever seen. The economy wasn't perfect, but the world doesn't envy what we have now. Watch money--the stock market--if you want to measure what's good or bad for business. Don't believe a carnival barker over what real money tells you. Ayn Rand said that. I know the idea now is no pain, no gain. I hope it gets better, but I fear it will get worse for a long time.  

It was so nice to forget about all that for a while today. 

I've caught a lot of winter pickerel on crappie jigs around brush, wood, stuff in the water. That's fun, because you see the pickerel bolt out of the sticks and hit. Oliver saw the like today, when he fished a paddletail and got the paddletail bit off.

I prefer live-lining shiners. This time of year. During the summers in recent decades, I've fished Yum Dingers. But I love the cold and cooler weather of the canal, because I like the feel of pickerel taking a shiner sidewise and bolting a few yards. Today, the pickerel that hit one of my shiners bolted from a couple feet away from the bank, directly to the bank, underneath some stuff. I got to feel the fish turning the shiner around in its mouth, but I was sure it was a really small fish, like a 10-inch pickerel. (Little ones like that are common in the canal.) I didn't let it take the shiner too long, afraid of gut-hooking it, and when I set the hook, I simply pulled the hook from that shiner in its mouth.

Brian and Oliver didn't quite dress for the weather. Especially with a heavy wind barreling down the big river, it was especially cold out there. Forty-four degrees felt much worse; it was miserable, but especially after I encountered the pickerel, I felt motivated and happy. 

It was time to go. Brian has Raynaud's disease, and even though he never dipped (Oliver and I did barehanded) into the minnow bucket, his numb hands turned purple without gloves. 

I understood the fishing wasn't going to go further. I would cast some more but not much more, and before I could tell myself to stop, I saw green gills flush and my shiner disappear.

I was standing beside Brian and Oliver. "I've got a nice one on," I said. I felt the fish pulling line out into the canal, tightened up on that line, and set the hook, expecting some fun from a pickerel about 18 inches long, a nice one for the canal. 

Turned out to be a little bass of about 10 1/2 inches. It's always a blessing to catch a bass in the cold canal.    

Brian Cronk fishing for walleye

Raritan River

Romp

 

 

Judging Differences Between Berkley Fishing Lines

Naturally, I returned to where I caught the trout over five pounds yesterday. I hooked up on my second cast and caught the rainbow photographed above.

I had walked hundreds of yards to get there, feeling positively expectant. I examined the feeling and judged that it didn't have to do with yesterday's catch. It was fresh and of it's own origin in things. Next, I wondered if that really meant I'd do well. Doubted that. But "of it's own origin in things," it easily could have had to do with the temperature rapidly rising to over 60, and more than that. It could have had to do with the approaching front, which, of course, I understood could mean active fish. The coming rain could have been just as important as the rising water temperature.

Spinning was appropriate again this morning. As it was the other day when all I did was snag a sucker, the wind even heavier. Fly fishing in 40 mph wind--or 25 to 30 mph as was today--is not easy to say the least. But you can spin cast.

I fished the 16th-ounce jig. Casting the Berkley Vanish fluorocarbon line I mentioned in the previous post was not as ergonomic as casting the Berkley XL. I had had my suspicions, when I paid five dollars more for a 250-yard spool of Vanish, than for a 310-yard spool of XL Oh, well. I like to pay attention to every increment in price and come up with the best value on expenditure, and whether or not I did this time? I think I did OK, but really, I don't like how it casts. It seems just as bad as the older fluorocarbon from Berkley I tried yesterday. Sometimes I can hear the stuff rasp as it goes through the guides! Face it, it's fluorocarbon and it will not be nearly as limp as a monofilament that is specially made to be limp. That's what the "L" of "XL" means.

You can buy Berkley XT and good luck with that stuff, although I've read forum threads and it does have a large fan base, so you might like it a lot better than I would. For good reason, too. Always a trade-off. The designation of the "T" in "XT" is for "tough," and tough it is, I'm sure. Good knot strength. Abrasion resistant. 

Also clear, and I don't like the blue, Stren-like, (another line brand), color of the XL. You have to trade off, and I might trade off Vanish for XL yet.

Vanish also had less diameter, and I do like that. Or at least I thought I did, and maybe I still do. It's .17mm. XL is .20. Here's the thing though. I don't seem to get casts out there any further, although it's true that after I switched to the eighth-ounce black marabou jig, expressly in order to cast further, I did get it closer to the far bank than I ever have, though I thought because I got better umph.

I could be mistaken. Does .03mm improve casting distance by a few inches or a foot or two or does that only mean you have to use up more line to fill your spool? Besides, won't a limp line cast a little further? I would think so. And so does this particular blogger.

So what I will probably do is end up scouring the internet for limp monofilament that doesn't have that blue shade I don't like. And if it has to be .20mm, OK. But I'll try to find limp, clear, and low diameter.

I like Berkley products, though. My scale is made by them and I've tested it on a five-pound bag of sugar. Spot on. Besides, Berkley has been in business since 1937.. I was big on them as a teenager, too, and having a long track record probably means you've stayed in business because you make good products. In Berkley's case, I would say so.  

And so I had ended up catching the second trout, photographed below, although that was before I switched to the heavier jig. I did miss a few hits today, and once came up with another sucker scale on the hook, if you've been reading along with my recent posts.

Both of my trout went back into the river. The five-plus-pound trout I caught yesterday is plenty for now. Unfortunately, the area of river where these fish are means they will, in all likelihood, die before summer, unless someone catches and keeps them. 

You'd hope the trout would have enough wherewithal to swim for the Atlantic.  

Odd-looking coloration for a rainbow trout.

Back in the Beginning

 

Rainbow Trout Weighing Over Five Pounds

 Yesterday, I fished a 16th-ounce black marabou, getting hit a couple of times and once having a fish on for a second, but you don't really know if you're snagging suckers, unless you really get struck. One of the hits yesterday did feel like the jibber-jab of a small trout. Curious. 

When I got skunked last time I fished the river, a couple of times my jig had a sucker scale impaled on the hook. I imagine big carp exist in the stretch, too, but the sizeable fish I hooked that same outing left behind a scale I'm sure had belonged to a sucker.

Since I get longer casts from an eighth-ounce jig, I switched to one of those, lost it to a snag, tied on another, lost that one. Meanwhile, I had had trouble with the old Berkley fluorocarbon I had loaded onto my Cetus, after blood knotting to the Berkley XL underneath. The stuff was doubling out on the cast, and twice I lost a lot of line and had to retie. Meanwhile, I'm wondering if the Berkley Vanish I ordered is really going to live up to the claim the company makes of its castability. 

I tied a 16th-ounce marabou onto that four-pound-test XL line, and judged that the stuff does cast marvelously--the XL does, I'll give you a review of the Berkley Vanish in the next post. Very soft, limp line, which does pose problems when it comes to getting snagged--you can't expect quite as good knot strength, and it won't do as well among abrasions like rocks and wood. You trade one thing off for another, but the Vanish is supposed to be good both ways. This other stuff I tried, while the Vanish is coming to me through Amazon Prime, might have been on the spool for 22 years, because I have spools of line collected in a plastic trash bag going back that long ago. I've kept them protected from sunlight, so they are still good, but fluorocarbon generally was not as good as it is now. 

Anyhow, I waded back out to my favorite spot within the stretch and worked that jig, getting pounded. The trout made itself visible almost immediately, so I felt relieved it was no sucker. Big trout. It really didn't fight very hard, and this is the second five-pound-plus trout I've caught that didn't fight hard. I caught a 24-inch rainbow at Round Valley Reservoir that didn't. Other big ones I've caught have fought hard as hell, though the 6.9-pounder just shy of seven pounds, which I also caught at Round Valley, didn't fight all that hard, either. 

Yesterday's was 23 1/4 inches, 5.3 pounds. A thick-bodied rainbow.

 

6.9

How to Jig for River Trout Can be Complicated

When I parked, the temperature was 65, and I felt confident it would remain high as I fished, possibly even provoke some of those rainbows in the spot to hit, along with the stimulus of the approaching front. I wasn't exactly raring to go. I didn't like the long walk through a large farmer's field, but I covered the distance pretty quickly, getting over-warmed in the process. 

I wanted to try one of my new NRC Creek Bugz, but I decided to leave the eighth-ounce Kalin's marabou jig on the hook, since it worked so well last time. Pretty soon, I hooked something heavy that began heading downriver, and then I lost it, feeling I had just lost a tank of a trout, but once I had reeled the jig in, I saw a scale on the hook, so I figured I had snagged an oversize sucker. 

I lost my jig and tied on an NRC (photographed above). Fishing one of them, I think, is a little more complicated than an eighth-ounce or sixteenth-ounce marabou. I mounted it on a 32nd-ounce jig head, and though I felt it cast pretty far, I couldn't get it close to the far bank as I did with the eighth-ounce jig, and with the heavy wind this afternoon, controlling the retrieve wasn't as easy. 

It's a much slower, plodding retrieve. It seems as if you can keep it near bottom without getting snagged nearly as often as you do with an eighth ounce. I retrieved the eighth-ounce jig fairly fast by comparison, and I was still getting hung up a lot. The water is pretty deep in the area of the long stretch I fished, too. Maybe one of the main advantages of fishing an eighth ounce is getting it across the river.

I hooked and lost a pretty nice trout last time I fished the stretch by having got the jig near the opposite bank and having just begun the retrieve. But today, I got hit once on my side of the mid-river. I had lost the NRC to a snag and tied on another eighth-ounce jig. It was a definite strike with a shaken-up series of pulls, and it came on the eighth-ounce jig and its faster retrieve. 

I've been told by a more experienced river trout fisherman not to fish that way. That an eighth ounce is way too heavy for the rivers during winter, but I keep getting hit and I usually catch trout. I think most of my river trout have hit that size, rather than jigs of a sixteenth ounce. Some advice is good, and I think I have yet to see if my friend's enthusiasm for NRC pays off in more catches for me.

But sometimes advice just doesn't work out. You need to follow up with and stick to your own way, as curious as you may be about someone else's. Fishing does have to do with hard fact, but there's enough leeway to allow for confidence in certain presentations to lead the way forward for any given angler. Cold water trout will hit a jig that has to be retrieved at at least a moderate retrieve.

They're that active in the winter. Think of all the smallmouth bass in our rivers and that they don't show up in winter catches. It's not the marabou they don't like. They're off the feed in general, because they don't hit NRC baits retrieved much slower, either. They do have to feed on occasion, but trout remain a lot more active than bass do. When its very cold out trout get hard to catch, though.

The temperature was falling fast. When I did get back to the car, it was 57. In the meantime, I felt disappointed the warmth didn't stay with me. I had switched to a sixteenth-ounce marabou--all of the marabou besides one a friend gave me are black--and hooked something that began fighting hard. In the water I saw brown and believed I had snagged another sucker, not hooked a brown trout.

It wouldn't have been impossible, but unlikely. As you can see in the photo, the sucker got hooked in the tail. It was fun fighting a fish to the bank. I had forgotten my net. I unhooked the fish and released it back into the river. Suckers are an integral part of the river's ecology, rather than really being any nuisance as carp can seem to be. As if, just maybe, carp disrupt the spawning of bass. Not sure.

I would have stayed longer and have tried harder yet to catch a trout today, but for the second time, my line came doubled up off the spool and knotted up. So much was lost, I wouldn't have been able to cast effectively, so I quit. Sometimes, to catch river stockers, you do need to double down. Next time, I'll try again. Trying to remember to use the jigs my friend Oliver gave me. 

Last Time

 

Ice Unsafe to Walk on Having Melted From Underneath

Gray instead of white.

I rode up to Mount Hope Pond with a bucket of shiners and fatheads, hoping for nice trout, pickerel, and bass. With 280 trout stocked into 18 surface acres of water, it's a possibility. Of course I knew I might find the ice unsafe, but I really expected it wouldn't be just yet. Again, I pulled into the large parking lot as I did once earlier in the ice season, and within seconds the pond came into view. It didn't look good. That gray off-color, rather than white, signaled to me that I probably wasn't staying here long. I quickly decided to first approach the pond with just my splitting bar. That no one else fished it, and Fridays might draw more anglers than other weekdays do, was also a definite sign that things weren't good. 

Of course, I had to check it out. And I stepped out on the ice a couple of feet from the beach, my feet getting moist because my waterproof boots aren't living up to that description, and I need to try to repair or replace them. Then I reached forward and whacked my way through the ice with two thrusts of my splitting bar. I did this repeatedly out of curiosity, but there was no hope. Three inches on top was slush, and maybe three or four inches underneath rotted out. 

I'm getting older and forgetful, it's true. How many times I've walked a plank to get onto a lake over the melt at the edge late in the ice season, I don't recall, but if I had had a plank, I might have walked it, and then tested the ice, say, eight feet from the edge of the beach. Then, I might have found hope existed yet. 

It's interesting to me how, quite apparently, the ice melts from underneath. I noticed what clearly seemed to be the phenomenon at Lake Aeroflex two days ago, when, by all we could judge, the ice had melted about four inches from underneath, having been a foot thick Thursday the week before. I only hedge from certain judgment because I want some peer review to back up what I've seen. Here, too. With three inches of slush and four inches of striated rot underneath, that's a total of seven inches. Oliver Round was up here a week ago when it was 15 inches thick.

That rot is a curiosity. I always refer to the striations, but most people speak of honeycombing. I recall once being out on Lake Hopatcong with my son when things began to get sketchy. This was almost two decades ago. The surface was soft, there was about four inches of striated ice, and three or four inches of hard ice underneath that rot, so I considered the ice safe and we fished. But if it melts from underneath, as it clearly seems to, why wasn't it striated all the way through? And besides, how do warmer temps permeate cold, hard ice to rot it down towards that surface underneath? 

I've paid attention to many ice conditions over the decades, but I've never noticed until two days ago that ice seems to thin out from underneath. I've seen plenty of that striated rot--which proves much of the whole mass is affected by the melt--but I've never had the opportunity to measure such differences as a foot and eight inches, 15 inches and about seven inches, as these recent outings have afforded me.  

My splitting bar head was welded onto the iron shaft, a cut having accommodated that chisel head.

Mount Hope Pond Revisited

 

Father and Son Who Know How to Ice Fish

Naturally Oliver and I hit the ice confidently after last week. Nothing was happening after an hour or two, but I still felt confident. Despite my persistent feeling for the back of the lake, where there's not such pressure on the fish. We took position where we saw salmon caught last time, and also set a few devices where we caught the bass and lost the pickerel. 

Someone who Oliver and I had seen in the distance down lake came in. As he was about to pass by, I asked how he did.

"I set up over the deep water and got no hits from salmon or trout after four hours. So I moved into the weeds and caught a bunch of pickerel. None of them were good-sized, though."

Soon a father and son arrived. They proved to be some of the most knowledgeable ice fishermen I've spoken to. Oliver spoke to them independently of me, and he nailed it when he told me, "Goes to show what ice fishing a lake repeatedly, results in." 

True. But Oliver didn't mean that in any derogatory sense, and even if they only fish here, they're good. When they set three Jaw Jackers in shallow water right near the bank of three or four feet, possibly a little deeper if three or four feet is just the top of the weeds, I thought they didn't know what they were doing. I had set tip-ups near the bank but not that near--in eight and five feet of water closer to the steep drop-off than the bank. Within 15 minutes, they had a fish I thought at first was a pickerel, then bass...but I swore the fish looked like a trout. When the second fish got caught from the same hole, Oliver swore it was a trout. Soon we talked to them, and, yes, the fish were trout. They had set six other devices, pretty much all in very shallow weeds, and the son jigged.

In the middle of all this, Oliver and I still waiting on our fatheads and shiners, a bald eagle showed up. It took position in a tree. I approached with my 70-200mm zoom on my Niko D850, and before I could get a shot to crop, it flew off. The father told me, "It wants the trout. It'll be back."

A few other ice fishermen left the lake, all of them apparently skunked. I assume so because we watched whenever one of them tended his tip-ups. No fish. And I later learned the father and son had given another the two trout. And we never saw him catch any. 

Oliver had to leave at 5:00 and he left fishless. I stayed on into dusk, leaving the lot perhaps a little after 6:00. In the meantime, the eagle returned twice, and the second time, the son had caught another trout--they had three in total, lost some hits, and lost something big that "might have been a pickerel," according to the father. 

The son tossed the trout away from him onto the ice. The eagle swooped low, extended talons forward, and took the gift.   

 

Cronk's First Ice Since Boyhood

About a Couple of Good Ones and Other Ice Action

My 18-inch largemouth came from beyond the edge of three-foot weeds but relatively near the bank. Pretty close to where I had fished in 2021.

Lake Aeroflex felt like nemesis, but I got over the feeling straight away, because that's not how Oliver felt about ice fishing there. I tried ice fishing it in March 2021. A full four years ago, and I remember it so clearly it seems recent.

You might think that since I remember it so well...but that really has nothing to do with how good the fishing was. It has to do, in general, with the awe I felt for how pressured the fish had been. Untold dozens of ice fishermen on that ice over the course of a couple months. It had nothing to do with how good the fishing was, besides my witnessing a trout caught by another party. That surprised me. I got skunked. And that did leave a bad taste in my mouth. 

Oliver's caught pickerel through the ice here before, though.

Aeroflex didn't seem as busy yesterday as four years ago. I called my blog post on that outing "Aeroflex Pounded," as my impression was of very pressured fish. Naturally, I felt yesterday that setting up in the far back of the lake might have been better, but things got interesting, instead, when I wholeheartedly agreed with Oliver that walking in that far might belong to an all-day outing. (Hamburgers and hotdogs might, too.)  

We had set up and endured a long wait. Before we had our first fish--my 18-inch largemouth--the guy who either owns the red ice tent in the photo above, or who was the partner of the owner, hooked a salmon that hit a medium shiner four feet under a tip-up. Oliver watched the dramatic struggle and told me--I was using the nearby restroom--the salmon was a big one. Two minutes later, the guy's partner caught a small salmon by jigging. (Apparently a school had moved in.) 

Afterwards, Oliver cut a new hole with his old style spoon hand auger. The ice was a foot thick, and though he sharpens the blade after almost every outing, it takes him an effort. That thing works, though, and he cuts holes faster than my gas auger is cutting now. I very much appreciate his cutting holes as my beloved gas auger is not well. I did manage to cut four or five holes, but that used up a lot of fuel. There's not much left in the tank, and only two thirds of a quart in the bottle. It used to be that the auger cut right through without using much gas at all. I sharpened the blades to no end before yesterday's outing, so it might have to do with the blades' pitch. I have to look into that yet. Besides the blades, the engine doesn't run smoothly. And mostly it runs at a slower rpm than it used to. What holds me back from buying a lithium ion auger is price and the possibility that we won't have ice in the future. Or maybe only four inches of it. Which I can cut with my splitting bar. I'm going to look into drill options. A drill mounted on an auger. 

Oliver put one of his Jaw Jackers into the hole he cut, closest to the boat ramp. It piqued my interest. In other posts I've written about my intuition. After Oliver caught his 22-inch pickerel from that hole, I said, "I had a feeling about that hole!" Oliver and Brian Cronk laughed. I understand. And it can seem odd to have such fixations, but they really just make life more interesting. When you "know" something in advance, you don't really. Nothing confirms knowledge but physical evidence unless it's introspection, but the feeling about the Jaw Jacker's potential can't be knowledge until the fish is on. And then the former feeling is, at least somewhat, confirmed. I've never spent the time to try to figure out to what degree knowledge is attained. It's interesting to ask why you would get intuitions about the possibilities of certain fishing situations for "no reason." I, for one, don't believe they happen for no reason. By listing every incident and providing additional descriptions of environments, I think one should be able to prove such intuitions do not happen randomly. 

The deeper question is: How does the human mind sense a fish coming? I could write all night if my mood was dialed in, but it's pretty simple. It has to do with having enough experience. I had to know something about the water Oliver set that Jaw Jacker in. Oooh...an interesting spot. That's all it is. It's not like I used to fish there when the water was open, but I knew enough about the weeds and the water being a little deeper there. Not that I had thought about it myself and set one of my tip-ups there before Oliver got to it, but once he did, I was immediately able to appreciate it. 

And it paid off--   

Oliver's 22-incher wasn't our only pickerel action. I had set a tip up over weeds three feet down, and though the flag failed to spring, the pickerel--I believe it was--took some 20 yards or more of line and came off during the fight. We also had two small pickerel take fatheads three feet under tip-ups set out for salmon and cut the line.

2021

 

The Vehicle Can Determine the Outing

Tilcon  Lake

As you grow older, you become more selective about what you do with your time, not just because you have less of it left, but because over the course of events while using your time, you take moments out to reflect on the value. That's not to say that as a teenager, when I would fish a little creek for redfin pickerel if I had to, my choices--and I fished almost every day year round--did not comprise an authentic pursuit that had a lot on what I do now. It's just to say there's a world of difference between the two.

I was willing to get out and fish for river trout today, until I realized my parking spot would have a pile of ploughed snow on it, and the lot at the other spot, where I don't particularly want to fish, anyway, might not be ploughed out. I don't see why the town would make the effort. All of which got me thinking again of life without four-wheel drive. Lately I've been trying to keep my mind open to reasons why it's not such a good thing to own a Honda Civic, even though that's the vehicle I own and that's not changing. Always one to save money, I save a lot of it. For one thing, if I were to buy an SUV, I'd only buy a good one with real four-wheel drive and good clearance. But to the purpose of the likes of parking today at the river? It's not like I have a boat on trailer to pull and launch--living in a condo, there's nowhere to park that. Nor is it that I surf fish enough to justify the cost of a beach buggy.

No, and all told, I fish a lot. With quality equipment at quality places. The Civic serves it all well. I need a second man to load my squareback canoe on top, but not only is that relatively easy to do, the car sits low enough that I can load my 13-footer alone. 

But today, the obvious thing to do would have been to drive to Mount Hope Pond, where I'm certain the ice is good and safe, and enjoy an outing alone. Or with whomever else is up there. That's a bit of a bugbear, because I really do like being altogether alone. When I fished Tilcon Lake a while back, I was all alone, except for some guys way back near the other end. Even though I almost broke my arm when I fell, it hardly ruffled me, certainly no bad mark on a great time. I bought crampons the day after, though. I intend to use them and not end up in the hospital. Had my arm broken, I wouldn't have been able to get my gear back out. 

Instead of going to Mount Hope, I've a lot to do. I was going to fish trout for little more than an hour. River's not a long drive away. I look ahead long term, when I decide on what to do short term. The time I invest in getting stuff done today, means I'm that much ahead of the future. I quit my job soon, retire from the Foodworker's union. By what people tell me, they think I'll do nothing but fish. People don't understand there's a world of value in being a writer regardless of fishing, if you have goals you want to achieve as a writer. Fishing is re-creation, however. No other form of recreation I do--and I do outdoor photography, I hike, I like to swim--rejuvenates me as fishing does. No matter how electric the feeling I have for my writing goals, that connection tends to short circuit and the exercise become no better than being a coach potato. From that drawback, there are two kinds of diversions. One of them the job has served all these decades. Working a job makes me think of my writing as the alternative, and I get a lot of ideas that way. I carry a notebook in my back pocket, and another notebook in my car, for that reason. The other diversion is recreation. Mostly fishing, which inspires some ideas, but mostly cleans out my system and revitalizes me in a big way. 

After I quit my job, I'll have the second kind of diversion. For the first kind, I have Starbucks over in the shopping mall. Maybe I'll find other ways to be out in society, too.  

Tilcon

Never Underestimate the Ability to Remember an Outing

I felt surprised we found water about 25 feet deep. We had parked at the East Picnic Area and began walking towards the dike, the pond's 30 acres being a fairly large space. I guess Oliver started cutting holes halfway there. 

With deep water not all that far from the bank, I made sure we opened and otherwise cut holes just off that bank over about 10 feet of water. Any pickerel would surely hit there, possibly bass, too, but I wasn't sure the bottom was weedy. 

Years ago, I used to walk this far and further towards the back of the pond when fishing on lunch breaks while otherwise working for Affinity Federal Credit Union. I caught bass, and I observed the water. I don't recall any weeds...until I got closer to the back of the pond where it is very weedy, but very shallow.

As I headed for where we'd cut holes today, I asked someone with tip-ups set nearer the pond's back if he'd caught anything. "A pickerel," he said. 

So I set a line of five tip-ups along about a hundred yards of bank-front. We had arrived at about 1:30 and had to be out of the park by 4:00, so we'd be packing it in before 3:30. I didn't have much faith in our setup, but Oliver did. In the past, my ice fishing partner and I had always taken at least four hits while fishing this pond. Oliver had set his Jaw Jackers in water at least 25 feet deep, except for one of them set way out towards the swimming beach, where the depth had come back up to maybe 15 feet. 

I was glad some of our shiners and fatheads were set out there, because I want to know about any bass. In 2022, we set a Jaw Jacker over 25 feet of water near the dike, which got hit. I had the fish on for only a second or two, though, and couldn't rule out a catfish. 

When Oliver caught his largemouth--over 15 inches, maybe 16 inches--in 25 feet of water on a little fathead minnow, another piece of the puzzle fell into place. I've never caught, nor seen bass caught, that deep in 49 years of ice fishing. It makes sense they'd go that deep, because the water's a little warmer, but do they inhabit the pond's deepest water of 40 or 45 feet? I would like to set a device that deep sometime.

Once I got my crampons over my Irish Setter pac boots, I marveled at the stupidity of having ice fished for 49 years without a pair. The ice was slippery today, but it could have been a lot worse, and in the past I've been on ice I shouldn't have been on without crampons. Just last week, I almost broke an arm and almost destroyed my Nikon D7100 camera, which, having hung loosely from my neck, got slammed against ice. What explains that other than stupidity? 

When ice as seen in the two photos is slippery, imagine what it's like when like that after the temperature rises above 32. Truly treacherous. I've been on ice like that, and it's almost impossible to walk on without cleats or crampons. That is, when there's a very thin melt, not yet the kind of melt that makes the ice soft. It doesn't always happen. I remember, in 2019, Brian Cronk and I ventured out on five inches of ice with the temp below freezing, having no trouble walking on it. Black ice. Newly formed. No snow on top. The temperature rose quickly to about 50, and we never had any problem with slippery ice. As we walked out, the ice was soft on top. Maybe if the temp had risen only to 33 or 34, it would have been slippery. Not sure how it works out. 

Apparently, the temperature today never got above 29. Holes froze up pretty quickly.

I'm linking to my first ice outing on the pond, my son's, too. It seems impossible that was seven years ago. You probably hear all the time about how fast time goes by, but it really does pass quickly. I'll give you a little advice, if you're interested. Get out and fish. We both know life consists in more than just fishing, anyway, so I see no harm in persuading for just a little more of it, perhaps. I wouldn't worry about fish populations. Oliver and I talked about how infrequently we see guys in their 20's out there fishing. Give fishing another five generations and you might worry about fish populations even less. I, for one, love to spend hours absorbed in reading a book, instead of fishing. I'm no intellectual genius who can read a page per second, though I'm informed that what you see in Good Will Hunting is no lie. There are people who can do that. No, I will lay back with a book deeply absorbed in it for as long as three hours at a time. Everything else going on around me tuned out. That's a longer span of time than Oliver and I fished today, and it's deeply rewarding to do that. But it's rewarding to fish, too, and you can measure the fact against your ability to remember fishing outings. You probably remember many throughout your lifetime, while daily chores are forgotten as easily as the daily news.  

Crampons marked trails on the ice.

Nice Pickerel

 

 

What Britain Lacks is Public Fisheries

Oliver Round's pickerel.

In a text, I told Oliver the fish are out there. Yes, I was thinking of salmon, especially, but after Monday, which was a great time alone but without fish, I'm happy to see we broke the silence with a number of live flags sounding off on those springy metal strips. Not that we could hear them above the wind and the conversation. A second fish on for me took a shiner but dropped it. Probably a perch. Oliver lost a couple. Each of us caught a pickerel.

Hearing the Gallup pole results at present, after kind of meeting George Gallup when I was a boy. He was a parishioner at Trinity Church, Princeton, which I attended with my family, and he might have sung in the Adult Choir, which my father led as the churches' music director. As much as choral and organ music as an American cultural influence has declined, it's not dead. I think it will always echo Britain's lead, and I don't believe that a relative lack in American church attendance will end the institution here, partly because of that lead the British world takes. What Britain lacks is public fisheries.   

Out there on the ice I was more aware of I-80 traffic than usual. It's not visible during the summer. 

Less of the sense of being out there. But still...

I had had us walk all the way to the drop-off beyond the shallow flat. That reflected my sense of possibility. I had to pick Oliver up at his house, and on the way to the lake, I did agree with him that right beyond the kayak launch is good. I was actually thinking of closer to shore than where we caught up to him, but in any case, what grabbed hold of me is that we might catch some fish further on. 

One of Oliver's Jaw Jackers did get hit with the fathead suspended about 10 feet over bottom in 35 feet of water, so rather than having been a yellow perch, that fish might have been one of the coveted salmon. I had five tip-ups rigged for salmon set out over such depth, but I didn't do any jigging today, even though I had 1/32-ounce jigs to tip with fatheads. 

Instead, I looked at salmon over my shoulder, figuring that some other time I might focus harder on catching one. Or some. One of Oliver's Jaw Jackers rigged with a large shiner got hit, and he caught the pickerel of about 17 inches. That got me thinking, after something had hit only some 15 minutes before in the same hole, and I got my power auger and began cutting more holes, after suffering that (gas) auger's temperamentality. I knew I set the bait suspended over weeds about 12 feet down, which, I had the hunch, was going to produce. While I cut those holes I watched a flag go up near the roaring powerhead. Obviously, working on the ice hadn't spooked that fish. That flag resulted in a pickerel of about 15 inches for me. The final product of my operation was a short row of tip-ups baited with large shiners on a weedy drop-off but nearer the shallow flat than to the 35-foot deep flat bottom. After we saw the tip-up in the middle of that row displaying a high flag, Brian soon had the pickerel I measured at about 22 inches on the ice.

A friend of Brian's, Mike, had showed up before we started catching the pickerel. He hung out awhile, and his cocker spaniel never seemed averse to the granular wetness and patches of shallow ice water up on top of the ice. Temps might have hit 53 degrees. I say that because my car thermometer had registered 50, and it felt warmer out there after a couple of hours, not because of my heavy clothing. Wind probably gusted to 40 miles per hour, and we had to reset some wind flags but not too many. Ice was about 8 inches thick in most places, probably 10 inches where I set that short row of tip-ups. 

All equipment in Brian's Jet Sled for the haul home, the ice had already firmed up significantly, meaning the temperature was 32 or colder at our feet, though it was 41 driving east on I-80.

  

 

Brian Cronk's slightly less than 22-incher.

Nice Pickerel